According to earthday.net, I have a Carbon Footprint that would require 6.2 planets per person if everyone in the would "lived like me" and I have a size 28 footprint.
This is very interesting... I don't have any clue as to what parameters are used to determine these results but I am told that if everyone in the world lived like me, we would need 6.2 planets... What are these 6.2 planets for?
Here are some great tips that everyone can do to reduce their carbon footprint:
1. Holidays - Don't go by air
2. Electricity - Sign up to renewable energy
3. Gas - Try using solar water heating - this can reduce your gas bill by up to 70% over a year.
4. Travelling around - Use public transport as much as possible. Find out about your local bus services and then use it.
5. Car Share - Sign up to a car share scheme to reduce your travel footprint
Many in this class, if not all, know that I question global warming... I, on the other hand, welcome most of the advances that have come along due to this phenomena, such as wind energy, tankless water heaters, waterless urinals, etc, etc, etc. I do question how buying trees to plant in some obscure part of the world (only way of getting there is by plane to plant the trees) will help offset my footprint. Based off the questions in this poll, I wounder what the answers would be to get down to one planet needed for everyone to live like me? Is this really obtainable?
I think that is would be great to have everyone living with a larger footprint than I to change their lifestyles and come to my level (no buying of offsets to help... just life style changes only). For instance say a 51-65 year-old female living in New York often eating animal based products and half of the food consumed is from far places. Owns a freestanding house with running water and is energy efficient that is larger than 2,500 s.f. with 2 persons living in it and only producing the same amount of trash as her neighbor. Her main mode of transportation is by car, usually traveling with a companion in a car that gets 15-25 miles to the gallon for up to 300-400 miles a week and seldom walks to get place to place, yet spends hundreds of hours flying here and there. Her Carbon footprint would be as follows:
That is... a footprint of 47 acres and would require 10.7 planets. In comparison to this person I look like a saint.
2 comments:
The 6.2 planets mean you use so many resources that you would need 6.2 times as many resources as earth if everyone lived like you. Amount of gas, meat and dairy products, single-family home with a small density of people in it - I don't think there are many people in the US or even western Europe that don't use more than their fair share of resources!
http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba230.html
Myths of Global Warming
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/archive/pr0310.html
20th Century Climate Not So Hot
http://www.junkscience.com/news/robinson.htm
Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Pledge
Gore Refuses Pledge
http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice.asp
Fire and Ice: Journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can't decide weather we face an ice age or warming
http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice_climchange.asp
U.S. Funds Nearly $4 Billion in Climate-Change Research
http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice_timeswarns.asp
The Times Warms to Cooling
http://epw.senate.gov/fact.cfm?party=rep&id=265087
Senator Inhofe Credited For Prompting Newsweek Admission of Error on 70's predictions of Coming Ice Age - In Case You Missed It....
http://www.americanpolicy.org/un/thereisnoglobal.htm
There is No Global Warming
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-329es.html
Long Hot Year: Latest Science Debunks Global Warming Hysteria
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/246027
Red faces at NASA over climate-change blunder
Post a Comment