9.30.2007
9.27.2007
Shading study
Final Studio: Code Analysis - Prelim
9.26.2007
Moving things forward....
STRUCTURAL PROGRESS
9.22.2007
Some time for reflection before the final push...
I look forward to the final reflection for this semester... I have learned a great deal.
Not everything I may want to be true is true, it is much harder to work backwards than forwards although sometimes backwards can further your progress, there is a lot outside my environment (Las Vegas, my firm, my consultants, jurisdictions, etc) that I am not familiar with and stepping into these areas can be frustrating as well as very rewarding both personally and demonstrated in design/thought process.
I feel that I spent 80% of my time doing 20% of the product.... This last week will offer, I hope; a lot of resolve to my design, motivation, thought process and knowledge base. To critically look at all the parts as a whole rather than small wholes that work individually has been the the most influential part of the semester to me. Looking back at the initial Parti (to be honest.. really the first time I started consciously and graphically to define a project from the start), I feel that I have still retained the individual parts... but may have missed on the whole and am eager to see how I these will start to have a better language and come together as a whole. I look forward to the thesis, professional work and other design problems knowing that I am armed with these new skills, thought process and critical review.
9.21.2007
Studio Final: Site and Roof Plan - Prelim
these points will make themselves more clear, hopefully, with the model images for the final sheets.
The sidewalk edge transitions to sandstone plaza steps (3' landings) descending 30" to the main entrance to the studio, green plaza, residential building. The gallery space that engages the sidewalk (under the second level of the residential) smashes into the plaza steps providing a visual way finding device to the entrance to the campus. This 30" elevation change allows for less cut/fill (I want to have these final numbers for the final presentation) as most of the business end building bar is at that grade.
a goal of 100% of storm water collection seems obtainable... the natural slope and building locations allows for roof run off water to be directed to a holding area where the water can be treated and used for irrigation, distributed to the nearby Groundwater Conservation District and reintroduced back into the earth to replenish the water table.
Studio Final: Section - Prelim
Final Studio: Structural - Prelim
As the plans started to take shape, simple/formal/clean lines emerged and the natural selection for the structural system seemed to be ICF, open web steel trusses and concrete over metal decking at both floor slab and roof deck.
The largest width being 25' at the circulation areas (9' and 16'-8" bays), the majority of the width being 18' at the living areas (three 24' bays) and a small section having a width of 21' at the lounge pod area (13'-8").
at the ground level, the roof deck will detail to the ICF as in Detail B
Studio Final: Elevations - Prelim
9.12.2007
Response to the comments
I agree that this type of conversation is extremely valuable and inportant.. and most times we use "fancy" words to express things that the architecture miss or fail at. I reall want this space to work (the "underneath") but feel that it will not really be the gateway it could be. As far as the structure goes... I will send it out to Kurt in pdf format... The framing plan really is for the 2-4 floors (they did not include the "breeze catcher") the exterior walls will be the ICF material and they will be constructed on the concrete over steel deck as this stacks up. The ground floor will be ICF on the grade slab. I will do a quick exploratio of a full section and structural system.
The use of collums I have been avoiding (to be honest) in hopes of keeping the linear/horizontal feel of the Boylston street scape. I will look at alternate options to achieve the root of linear.
There is so much to say and discuss... But at this stage is will be create,post,test,fail,rework and repeat...
This all said, I still need the deliverables... a functional building, a sense of space and an experiance that is natural to the site, BAC and profession.
As I continue to work through these things I am confident that all will work with solid backing without hiding behind fancy words...but supported by the root of the fancy words.
Posted via email from my cool Q.
Structral system - Studio/Admin
Kurt... if there are any suggestions for the curved steel truss systems... that would be a great help. I do have a few resources here... and will call upon them.
Structural systems... Dorms
As the plans started to take shape, simple/formal/clean lines emerged and the natural selection for the structural system seemed to be ICF, open web steel trusses and concrete over metal decking at both floor slab and roof deck.
The largest width being 25' at the circulation areas (9' and 16'-8" bays), the majority of the width being 18' at the living areas (three 24' bays) and a small section having a width of 21' at the lounge pod area (13'-8").
at the ground level, the roof deck will detail to the ICF as in Detail B
9.11.2007
Comments to the forefront...
werner said...
Ken,I see you are drawing 4 floors in your elevations.Yoyr (only) plan so far shows two. Are you proposing to revise th eplan any time soon?
September 10, 2007 5:27 AM
Ken Ballard said...
I will repost the plans (dorm) as they have changed a small bit... each dorm sleeps one and there is still a jack-n-jill bath between two rooms, with one small lounge-pod per level.In scheme one, the 2nd and 4th flor swings out towards Mass Ave and in scheme two all four levels stack with a breal inbetween the 2nd and 3rd levels. I will repost when I get home.
September 10, 2007 8:19 AM
werner said...
Ken, together with the plans I understand the "swinging-out-thing". I appreciate the framed entrance to the academic building, but the proportions are not comfortable at all. The opening is oppressively low and the span way too big. We do have a building here in Boston, where a dormitory wing spans a courtyard below. The span is about the same as yours, it is twice the widths, but the opening is at least four stories tall (see link: http://www.boston.com/news/galleries/magazine/2004/0222/harvard3.htm ). The space underneath is hardly ever used. Turning the idea into a gateway seems more promising. But I think you would have to reduce the span and turn out the third floor instead. I don’t understand the horizontal openings (on the left floor 2 and on the right floor 3); they seem useless for occupancy, difficult to build and rather unsightly, especially in the city context.In plan the stair wrapping the elevator does not meet code: Exit stair cannot contain any non-stair related element (incl. elevator)
September 11, 2007 8:51 AM
1. An opening or a structure framing an opening, such as an arch, that may be closed by a gate.
2. Something that serves as an entrance or a means of access: a gateway to success; the gateway to the West.
3. Software or hardware that enables communication between computer networks that use different communications protocols. Also called router2.
9.10.2007
Site Study - explorations of entrances...
okay... is it to late to have this up for debate? the second story of the dorms is at 11-12 feet above the side walk.... creating a covered area (where the blue lines are) a series of plaza of steps step down into the site 3-5 feet... during this transition the public space of the main building will start to engage the public realm as it climbs up the stairs under the dorms...
9.09.2007
Elevation schemes revised...
Elevation schemes
Intensive - Mid Crit
comment - the current site plan feels a little under developed
response - revised site plan speaks more to a fully developed plan where the circulation and site movement patterns are more deliberate.
comment - the symmetry is hurting the resolution... how to get from one to another... studio to main entry from the site 'entry'?
response - the symmetry of the two buildings (dorm and admin/studio) are in response the the major axes (Boylston and the 'Pike'), there is a subtle axis created by the below grade parking in response to the Boylston Apartment Building adjacent to the site.